|
博爾塔拉翻譯公司關鍵字：The third reason is that China was still in the process of transition to a market economy, let the West once and for all recognize China's market economy status, is unrealistic. From this point of view, China was a certain degree of compromise is necessary.
Empirical Analysis: China due to "ambush" caused the loss of muchWTO definition of dumping: a country's products less than "normal value" price of exports to another country, and the importing country related industries caused the damage. Was found to be dumping on the enterprise, the importing country can impose its high punitive tariffs. Chinese enterprises have suffered so much loss, would be difficult to clear enough, because the various companies, among the various industries is an interlocking chain, a business and industry by the unfair anti-dumping against the penalty, there will be a domino domino effect, associated adverse impacts to other businesses and industries. Easy to calculate direct losses, indirect losses are not measured.
China as a "non-market economy", in response to anti-dumping can not be used as the basis of China's production costs, but can only find a "third country (alternative country)" as a reference. The key lies in the "third country", it's the cost of similar products may be far higher than China, so that the anti-dumping case, the likelihood of China's exports will not dumping had been found as "dumping", the dumping margin would have been held to a high degree of mild dumping, and thus to create artificial barriers to Chinese exports. Frequent in some countries to China is a "non-market economy" as an excuse for the anti-dumping into China on trade protection or economic discrimination tool.
We are twice as long as the TV anti-dumping case, for example, you can visually see how much China has suffered this loss. The most recent was in May 2004 just settled for "American Enterprise v. Chinese enterprises TV dumping", select the surrogate country, India, and India, the average raw material prices in China six times, which directly led to China's color TV production costs are overestimated, leading to China in responding to the extreme disadvantage. The United States impose China's color TV up to 78.45% of the tariffs, the Chinese color TV exports to the United States into a "lose out money", which led to the first half of 2004 China trade to the United States less than same period of 2003 TV 1 / 3, and may even be so that some Chinese color TV enterprises have lost one of the three largest U.S. TV market. Moreover, China's color TV sets manufacturing industry suffered losses also spread to the entire TV industry chain, such as semiconductors, tubes, components, plastics, industrial facilities and other areas.The clock back to 1988, another case - the EU China's color TV dumping complaint in this case, the EU chose 20 times the human cost of China as an alternative to the country of Singapore, Chinese color TV enterprises accordingly ruled that dumping has resulted in China shut out by the European TV market for 15 years, greatly hindered the process of internationalization of China's color TV!
|