|
揚(yáng)州翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：Summary: The theory of institutional change two different paths to explore, not only in theory in practice for more market-oriented reforms China has practical significance. This paper attempts to North's theory of institutional change tools rationalism and Hayek's evolutionary theory of institutional change rationalism on the theoretical context to sort out, and put all to the inspection of China's reform process, the government-led institutional change way for a rational logic, the government hopes to have a better understanding of the dominant mode, the system changes for the government-led study provides useful ideas.
Key words: the system changes the evolution of government-led tools of rationalism rationalismAbstract: The study of two theoretical paths in research of institutional change has realistic significance to China's marketing reform not only theoretically but practically. The article analyses the main bodies of North's Tool Rationalism Institutional Change theory and Hayek's Evolutionary Rationalism Institutional Change theory, and also tests them in the practice of China's reform. It is hoped that the rational thinking of the pattern of government-dominated institutional change would provide useful path for the study of government-dominated pattern in China's reform.
Keywords: Institutional Change; Government-dominated; Tool Rationalism; Evolutionary RationalismA study of the two paths of institutional change
Exploration of the theory of institutional change, according to their different thought path orientation, probably can be divided into two different paths of research, that is a tool to represent North rationalist theory of institutional change and the evolution of Hayek as the representative of rationalism theory of institutional change (Wesson, 2001, Hu Haifeng Li Wen, 2003, Zhou Xiaoliang, 2004). These two different orientations to guide thinking out of the path changes in the system of government as well as the different ways or recognize. Therefore, China's government-led changes in the way of the system, we need to study the path of these two main ideas for the brief comb.
1, the North's idea of ??institutional change tools rationalismNorth's theory of institutional change in its majestic study of economic history expounded. In the methodology, he followed the neo-classical analysis of the mainstream school spirit, the use of the concept of economic man, the cost - benefit analysis and the static equilibrium analysis and comparison of static methods, and the introduction of transaction costs Coase's theoretical results, constructed The basic model of institutional change theory framework, that is, changes in relative prices of non-equilibrium systems → → → primary behavioral groups appear to provide the necessary sub-system behavior of groups → system of balanced reproduction device (North Davis, 1976).
North's theory of institutional change is in their property rights theory, state theory and ideology based on the theory. In the "rise of the Western world" (North Thomas, 1998), the North and his collaborators believe that the sixteenth and seventeenth century Dutch and British economic growth is due to produce a series of effective system of property rights, that factors of production: land, labor, capital and technology to effectively define, protect, and implementation of exclusive private property rights. In the "Economic History Structure and Change" (North, 1991), the North and further show that it is state or government of such an effective system of property rights provides the necessary institutional arrangements. According to North view, private property rights structure is to maximize the interests of the rulers to satisfy their own desires and deliberately designed, constructed and defined results. And ideology, North (1991) suggested that this was a deal of cost savings tool, its function is the ability to effectively overcome the "free rider" behavior. We believe that the tools in North logic rationalism, ideology is actually the so-called system of decision-makers as the rulers in the construction and implementation of its institutional
|