|
四平翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：Abstract: This paper studies the introduction of the industry cluster analysis of state intervention, focused on the growth of world industrial clustering, the evolution pattern and make a brief comment, from the perspective of future development, to examine the dynamic model of the evolution of China's industrial agglomeration and development trends. Keywords: industrial clustering pattern analysis of market畢業(yè)論文翻譯成英語(yǔ)文章-oriented type of plan-based government supportOne. World comparative study of industrial clustering model Through the growth of world industrial clustering, evolution and comparative study found that state intervention in each country during the formation of industrial zones are present and play a role. According to state intervention in the process of industrial concentration degree of the strength of the role of market畢業(yè)論文翻譯成英語(yǔ)文章 mechanism and the role of government as well as the level of interaction, the state-level industry gathering of the model is divided into three types: (1) market畢業(yè)論文翻譯成英語(yǔ)文章-oriented industry cluster model to the U.S. Silicon Valley, Third Italy and the Nordic countries more representative; (2) government support of industry cluster-based model to Tsukuba, Japan, India, Bangalore and Hsinchu, Taiwan and other countries more representative; (3) program-based industry cluster mode, the former Soviet Union and the regional production complex of China's reform and opening up a large gathering area, represented by state-owned enterprises.1 market畢業(yè)論文翻譯成英語(yǔ)文章-oriented model of industrial clustering The modes of industrial clustering mainly in Europe and developed countries as a typical representative of the market畢業(yè)論文翻譯成英語(yǔ)文章 economy, there are the following basic characteristics: 1) the market畢業(yè)論文翻譯成英語(yǔ)文章 mechanism is perfect, the growth of industrial clustering, largely dependent on the evolution of market畢業(yè)論文翻譯成英語(yǔ)文章 and industry interact to complete. Concentration is generated bottom-up, through the pursuit of the benefits of business-to-gather spontaneously formed (Weber, 1909). 2) external policy forces the growth of industrial clustering, the evolution of the impact is indirect, auxiliary, mainly by regulating the industry cluster constraints to prevent the occurrence of agglomeration externalities. 3) Government regulation often appear in clusters after the ex-post regulation.
|